There are many reasons behind the emergence of Egypt in professional mens squash but here I will comment on the importance they place on hitting front court winners.

Obviously, this skill is facilitated by an excellent all round squash ability but it seems to me that the shot hierarchy in Egypt over the years may have been different from the other squash playing nations. When choosing which shots should hold precedence over the other – disguise; creativity and attacking angles seem to have been elevated above all else. The game is built from the winning shot backwards.

I will use an educational analogy to illustrate this point further, traditionally such subjects as English, Maths and the Sciences have been considered the most important when it comes to securing a job on completion of your education and because of this they are duly given the most attention and scrutiny. Yet given the growing diversity of the workplace, subjects previously less well regarded may well be of greater importance with the old standards only needed in an accompanying capacity.

In squash, the dominant players in the professional era starting with Jonah Barrington and Geoff Hunt have mostly put their faith in the back court, in particular in containment through perfecting the straight and crosscourt drive. In recent years with the introduction of point a rally scoring and the lowering of the tin, the landscape of the squash world has changed drastically.

Could the shot making legacies of the Egyptians through the years finally be bearing the sweet fruits of a commitment to attacking, expressive squash? A sort of divine justice to the purists?

It may be that the new order is enjoying the predictability of a back court strategic game and the mental rigidity it can promote. The conundrum posed to players and coaches alike is where the game will go in the next five years, who will get ahead of the curve and plan now to succeed later. For obvious reasons the tired expression of the game as it was dims as we retain only which is necessary. The pursuit of excellence will not allow anything superfluous.

Of course, on this topic it could be argued that Ramy Ashour aside, the other four Egyptian representatives currently in the top ten PSA rankings (El Shorbagy, Darwish, Shabana, Mosaad) have games built on solid fundamentals and consistent intensity. But saying that, all of them have that fearless quality to find the nick without effort when the situation requires.

There are many interesting tangents which form from these thoughts, maybe we will mull them over in the future.


re squash god


2 thoughts on “The Egyptian Hierachy

  1. I tend to see Egyptian and British squash as two sides of the same coin. Now, I think the two styles are converging in the middle, the main difference being the accurate and intuitive nature of the Egyptian attacking play. I have seen very attacking styles in one or two English players who have since moved towards the “English” style of play to become more rounded players (perhaps as some of the Egyptian players moved in the opposite direction). I have also seen English players begin to learn to attack like Egyptians. I think there is a lot to be said for learning these skills early on though, as the Egyptians do, when confidence can be more easily ingrained and fear of failure is not so present.

  2. Yes, but what about Nick Mathew and Peter Nicol. I’m not sure style has a lot to do with it. Either you’re a great player or you’re not. Look at Jonathan Power, is he anything to do with a Canadian squash style or is it just him.

    Remember, in the grand scheme of things, Wilstrop could never really beat Palmer at his best, Palmer couldn’t beat a Peter Nicol at his best and Peter Nicol couldn’t beat Jansher Khan at his best. He only managed it once pre 1997, and a few times at the end of Jansher’s physical capacity in late 1997 early 98. Shabana couldn’t beat Nicol either and El Shorbagy hasn’t had much success against James Wilstrop.

    Is Gaultier and Lincou reflective of the French style?

    I think what has changed is Ramy, but him as an individual rather than a style…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s